2026-04-03-yomiya-content-intake-benchmark
Yomiya Content Intake Flow Implementation Plan
Section titled “Yomiya Content Intake Flow Implementation Plan”For Claude: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
Goal: Replace the heavier intake benchmark with a simpler research-stage flow where humans preselect resources and the system only handles transcript acquisition, classification, and failure fallback.
Architecture: Keep value judgment outside the system intake flow. Treat human selection as the upstream gate, then make the docs describe only the downstream system responsibilities.
Tech Stack: Markdown docs in product/YomiyaContentSystem/archive/plans/ and the historical Yomiya documentation tree
Task 1: Update the design summary
Section titled “Task 1: Update the design summary”Files:
- Create:
product/YomiyaContentSystem/archive/plans/2026-04-03-yomiya-content-intake-benchmark-design.md
Step 1: Write the simplified design
Cover:
- why the old benchmark still over-modeled system-side gatekeeping
- why human preselection should be treated as a prerequisite
- why the system now focuses on transcript and classification
Step 2: Verify the file exists
Run: test -f product/YomiyaContentSystem/archive/plans/2026-04-03-yomiya-content-intake-benchmark-design.md
Expected: success
Task 2: Rewrite the benchmark document as a lightweight flow
Section titled “Task 2: Rewrite the benchmark document as a lightweight flow”Files:
- Modify:
product/YomiyaContentSystem/30-Research-and-Evidence/foundations/yomiya-content-intake-benchmark.md
Step 1: Remove value-gating language
Delete or replace:
research_poolformal_candidate- multi-stage intake value judgment
Step 2: Replace with the lightweight processing flow
Document:
- minimal registration
- transcript path selection
- classification outputs
- failure fallback
Step 3: Add the simplified Mermaid flowchart
Keep the diagram centered on:
- human preselection
- transcript path
- classify
- fallback
Task 3: Rewrite the workflow doc
Section titled “Task 3: Rewrite the workflow doc”Files:
- Modify:
product/YomiyaContentSystem/30-Research-and-Evidence/foundations/yomiya-content-research-workflow.md
Step 1: Change the recommended execution order
Replace the old benchmark-first wording with:
- human picks a batch
- system tries transcript
- classify successes
- record failures
Step 2: Replace the workflow diagram
The workflow should no longer imply that the system is rating resource value.
Task 4: Align the sample-list usage note
Section titled “Task 4: Align the sample-list usage note”Files:
- Modify:
product/YomiyaContentSystem/30-Research-and-Evidence/samples/播客与视频竞品统一样本清单.md
Step 1: Update the usage guidance
Make future editors follow:
- human preselection first
- transcript first
- classification second
- do not overfill rows before text is available
Step 2: Verify the note is readable
Run: sed -n '170,188p' product/YomiyaContentSystem/30-Research-and-Evidence/samples/播客与视频竞品统一样本清单.md
Expected: the note reflects the simplified flow